Discuss April Main article:
To what extent do you agree or disagree? Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is waste of resources.
But I completely disagree with this point of view. In my opinion, animals living in the wild always have an important position at all times. It is an inconsideration to assert that they are not necessary for today's life. Earth's ecosystem will be fell in the hazardous if our planet lack of wildlife, and that is the enormous impact on life, activity, and livelihood of many people.
The decreasing of wild animals is almost created by our process of industrialization, emissions, indiscriminate hunting, etc. In consequence, human habitat can be in a state of severity is ecological imbalance and the number of animal species was being extincted.
Furthermore, I do not argue that there is waste of resources to protect animals existing in the wild. Defending wildlife is defending our life, it can not say that protecting our own life is squandering.
Plants, animals, human and environment constitute a biological community - an ecosystem where each of them depends on each other to survive.
When a part of this community falls into an imbalanced or eliminated state, the entire ecosystem will suffer the terrible effects.
In conclusion, human being is not the only owner of Earth, this planet had many species lived here before us, so we do not have the right to assume that all the benefits of this earth belong to humankind only.
Therefore, our all responsibility is to conserve wild animals, for existence of Earth, for our own sake.It is against the law to keep wild animals as pets in most places. Keeping wildlife as pets is harmful to both the animals and the humans who try to keep them as pets.
They can carry diseases that can spread to people and other animals.
Animals were made from the same dust as humans and have the same breath of life in them as we do, but God made men and women in His own image and entrusted them with the responsibility of overseeing, protecting, and enjoying the rest of His creation.
Animals were made from the same dust as humans and have the breath of life in them as we do, but God made men and women in His own image and entrusted them with the responsibility of overseeing, protecting, and enjoying the rest of His creation.
It changes the polarity of the question from "do animals have rights" to "can I justify mistreatment of animals." (i.e., do I have the right to treat them in a certain way).
I do not pretend to understand what all "made in the image of God" means, but there are some things I know it does not mean: It does not mean that animals do not have souls, Genesis chapter 1 proves that.
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is waste of regardbouddhiste.com what extent do you agree or disagree? Essay topics: Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is waste of resources.