It is in our interests to believe in the God of Christianity, the argument suggests, and it is therefore rational for us to do so. If we believe in the Christian God, the argument runs, then if he exists then we will receive an infinitely great reward in heaven while if he does not then we will have lost little or nothing. If we do not believe in the Christian God, the argument continues, then if he exists then we will receive an infinitely great punishment in hell while if he does not then we will have gained little or nothing.
What is Pascal's Wager? Pascal's Wager is named after 17th-century French philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal. It is in this work that we find what is known as Pascal's Wager.
If we live as though God exists, and He does indeed exist, we have gained heaven. If, on the other hand, we live Pascals wager though God does not exist and He really does exist, we have gained hell and punishment and have lost heaven and bliss.
If one weighs the options, clearly the rational choice to live as if God exists is the better of the possible choices. Pascal even suggested that some may not, at the time, have the ability to believe in God.
This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Pascal. If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Pascal's Wager about God. Blaise Pascal () offers a pragmatic reason for believing in God: even under the assumption that God’s existence is unlikely, the potential benefits of believing are so vast as to make betting on theism rational. The super-dominance form of the argument conveys the basic Pascalian idea, the expectations argument refines it, and the dominating expectations. “Pascal’s Wager” is the name given to an argument due to Blaise Pascal for believing, or for at least taking steps to believe, in God. The name is somewhat misleading, for in a single section of his Pensées, Pascal apparently presents at least three such arguments, each of which might be called a ‘wager’—it is only the final of these that is traditionally referred to as “Pascal’s Wager”.
In such a case, one should live as if he had faith anyway. Perhaps living as if one had faith may lead one to actually come Pascals wager faith. Now there have been criticisms over the years from various camps. For example, there is the argument from inconsistent revelations.
This argument critiques Pascal's Wager on the basis that there is no reason to limit the choices to the Christian God. Since there have been many religions throughout human history, there can be many potential gods.
Another critique comes from atheist circles. Richard Dawkins postulated the possibility of a god that might reward honest disbelief and punish blind or feigned faith.
Be that as it may, what should concern us is whether or not Pascal's Wager can be squared with Scripture. The Wager fails on a number of counts. It will be an incomplete knowledge of God, but it is the knowledge of God nonetheless.
Second, there is no mention of the cost involved in following Jesus. In the gospel of Luke, Jesus twice warns us to count the costs of becoming His disciple Luke 9: There is a cost to following Jesus, and it is not an easy price to pay.
Jesus told His disciples that they would have to lose their lives in order to save them Matthew Following Jesus brings with it the hatred of the world John Pascal's Wager makes no mention of any of this.
As such, it reduces faith in Christ to mere credulity. Third, it completely misrepresents the depravity of human nature. The natural man—one who has not been born again by the Holy Spirit John 3: Faith is a result of being born again and that is a divine work of the Holy Spirit.
This is not to say that one cannot assent to the facts of the gospel or even be outwardly obedient to the law of God. However, the sign of true saving faith is the fruit it produces Matthew 7: Paul makes the argument that the natural man cannot understand the things of God 1 Corinthians 2: Because they are spiritually discerned.
Pascal's Wager makes no mention of the necessary preliminary work of the Spirit to come to the knowledge of saving faith.Angels & Evolution Click To Read This The supernatural origins of humanity is deduced from the frontiers of quantum physics, angels, with "cosmic shortcuts", and Near Death out of body Experiences NDEs (see video Daniel Ekechukwu - below, and video Ian McCormack Glimpse of Eternity - below); along with the rationale for "cosmic shortcuts".
An argument according to which belief in God is rational whether or not God exists, since falsely believing that God exists leads to no harm whereas correctly believing that God exists may lead to an eternal reward.
[After Blaise Pascal.] (Philosophy) philosophy the argument that it is in one's.
Answer: Pascal's Wager is named after 17th-century French philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal. One of Pascal’s most famous works was the Pensées (“Thoughts”), which was published posthumously in Pascal's Wager is an argument in philosophy presented by the seventeenth-century French philosopher, mathematician and physicist Blaise Pascal (–).
It posits that humans bet with their lives that God either exists or does not. Taking Pascal's Wager: Faith, Evidence and the Abundant Life and millions of other books are available for Amazon Kindle.
Learn more. Pascal's Wager. In the seventeenth century the mathematician Blaise Pascal formulated his infamous pragmatic argument for belief in God in regardbouddhiste.com argument runs as follows.