Null pointer assignment

Is it legal and moral for a member function to say delete this? This includes code that will run in destructors for any objects allocated on the stack that are still alive. In other words, you must not examine it, compare it with another pointer, compare it with nullptr, print it, cast it, do anything with it. How do I allocate multidimensional arrays using new?

Null pointer assignment

Type conversions Implicit conversion Implicit conversions are automatically performed when a value is copied to a compatible type. This is known as a standard conversion. Standard conversions affect fundamental data types, and allow the conversions between numerical types short to int, int to float, double to int Converting to int from some smaller integer type, or to double from float is known as promotion, and is guaranteed to produce the exact same value in the destination type.

Other conversions between arithmetic types may not always be able to represent the same value exactly: If a negative integer value is converted to an unsigned type, the resulting value corresponds to its 2's complement bitwise representation i.

If the conversion is from a floating-point type to an integer type, the value is truncated the decimal part is removed. If the result lies outside the range of representable values by the type, the conversion causes undefined behavior.

Otherwise, if the conversion is between numeric types of the same kind integer-to-integer or floating-to-floatingthe conversion is valid, but the value is implementation-specific and may not be portable.

Auto_ptr - Wikipedia

Some of these conversions may imply a loss of precision, which the compiler can signal with a warning. This warning can be avoided with an explicit conversion. For non-fundamental types, arrays and functions implicitly convert to pointers, and pointers in general allow the following conversions: Null pointers can be converted to pointers of any type Pointers to any type can be converted to void pointers.

Null pointer assignment

Implicit conversions with classes In the world of classes, implicit conversions can be controlled by means of three member functions:Embarcadero is a social community site which connects people who are interested in embarcadero products and also user can access product info, new & events.

Embarcadero helps to create blog, gain knowledge, experience, job opportunities and code sharing. auto_ptr is a class template that was available in previous versions of the C++ Standard Library (declared in the header file), which provides some basic RAII features for C++ raw has been replaced by the unique_ptr class..

The auto_ptr template class describes an object that stores a pointer to a single allocated object that ensures that the object to which it points gets. If you think you have found a security bug in OpenSSL, please report it to us..

Show issues fixed only in OpenSSL , , , , , , , Why does the second test still see the pointer as not NULL?

I am trying to use a NULL pointer assignment as a sort of 'return flag' to indicate a certain failure of the function. But upon testing the pointer afterwards, it does not seem to be NULL.

Variable Substitution. The name of a variable is a placeholder for its value, the data it regardbouddhiste.comncing (retrieving) its value is called variable substitution.

Here, the value of a is promoted from short to int without the need of any explicit operator. This is known as a standard regardbouddhiste.comrd conversions affect fundamental data types, and allow the conversions between numerical types (short to int, int to float, double to int), to or from bool, and some pointer regardbouddhiste.comting to int from some smaller integer type, or to double from.

Stroustrup: C++ Glossary